Resolution in U.S. Senate to recognise McMahon Line as international boundary
- Two United States Senators have introduced a bipartisan resolution reiterating that the US recognises the McMahon Line as the international boundary between China and India in Arunachal Pradesh.
- The resolution reaffirms India’s well-known and established position that Arunachal Pradesh, which China calls ‘South Tibet’, is an integral part of India.
What is the McMahon Line?
- The McMahon Line serves as the de facto boundary between China and India in the Eastern Sector.
- It specifically represents the boundary between Arunachal Pradesh and Tibet, from Bhutan in the west to Myanmar in the east.
China’s claimes:
- China has historically disputed the boundary and claims the state of Arunachal Pradesh as part of the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR).
When was it drawn?
- The McMahon Line was drawn during the Simla Convention of 1914, officially described as the Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet.
- The McMahon Line delimited the respective spheres of influence of Tibet and Northeast India and Northern Myanmar.
The Simla Convention:
- The border in this region was undefined prior to the signing of the convention.
- The convention attempted to settle the question of Tibet’s sovereignty and avoid further territorial disputes in the region.
- The treaty divided the Buddhist region into “Outer Tibet” and “Inner Tibet”:
- Outer Tibet would remain in the hands of the Tibetan Government at Lhasa under Chinese suzerainty, though China was not allowed to interfere in its affairs.
- Inner Tibet would be under the direct jurisdiction of the newly formed Republic of China.
- It also determined the border between China proper and Tibet as well as Tibet and British India.
- While a draft convention was agreed upon by all three countries on April 27, 1914, China immediately repudiated it.
- The final convention was only signed by McMahon on behalf of the British government and Shatra on behalf of Lhasa.
- China did not consent to the convention, arguing that Tibet had no independent authority to enter into international agreements.
Prelims Take Away
- Location Based Question
- Shimla Convention
- McMohan Line