Banner
Workflow

Resolution in U.S. Senate to recognise McMahon Line as international boundary

Contact Counsellor

Resolution in U.S. Senate to recognise McMahon Line as international boundary

  • Two United States Senators have introduced a bipartisan resolution reiterating that the US recognises the McMahon Line as the international boundary between China and India in Arunachal Pradesh.
  • The resolution reaffirms India’s well-known and established position that Arunachal Pradesh, which China calls ‘South Tibet’, is an integral part of India.

What is the McMahon Line?

  • The McMahon Line serves as the de facto boundary between China and India in the Eastern Sector.
  • It specifically represents the boundary between Arunachal Pradesh and Tibet, from Bhutan in the west to Myanmar in the east.

This is image title

China’s claimes:

  • China has historically disputed the boundary and claims the state of Arunachal Pradesh as part of the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR).

When was it drawn?

  • The McMahon Line was drawn during the Simla Convention of 1914, officially described as the Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet.
  • The McMahon Line delimited the respective spheres of influence of Tibet and Northeast India and Northern Myanmar.

The Simla Convention:

  • The border in this region was undefined prior to the signing of the convention.
  • The convention attempted to settle the question of Tibet’s sovereignty and avoid further territorial disputes in the region.
  • The treaty divided the Buddhist region into “Outer Tibet” and “Inner Tibet”:
  • Outer Tibet would remain in the hands of the Tibetan Government at Lhasa under Chinese suzerainty, though China was not allowed to interfere in its affairs.
  • Inner Tibet would be under the direct jurisdiction of the newly formed Republic of China.
  • It also determined the border between China proper and Tibet as well as Tibet and British India.
  • While a draft convention was agreed upon by all three countries on April 27, 1914, China immediately repudiated it.
  • The final convention was only signed by McMahon on behalf of the British government and Shatra on behalf of Lhasa.
  • China did not consent to the convention, arguing that Tibet had no independent authority to enter into international agreements.

Prelims Take Away

  • Location Based Question
  • Shimla Convention
  • McMohan Line

Categories