Banner
Workflow

India should refuse America’s ‘NATO Plus’ bait

Contact Counsellor

India should refuse America’s ‘NATO Plus’ bait

  • Recently. US Permanent Representative to North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) invited India to join the alliance during a virtual press briefing in March on the NATO focus on South Asia & Indo-Pacific region”.
  • Reflecting the same sentiment, the U.S. House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the US & Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recommended strengthening the ‘NATO-Plus’ framework by including India in the grouping.

NATO

  • About: A transatlantic military alliance of 31 countries, with the majority of members from Europe.
  • Last member: Finland is its 31st member (April 2023).

NATO Plus

  • About: It refers to a security arrangement of NATO and the five treaty allies of the U.S. — Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel, and South Korea as members — to enhance “global defence cooperation” and win the “strategic competition with the Chinese Communist Party”.
  • Not officially recognised concept within NATO: It has been used in discussions and debates regarding the potential expansion of the alliance.
  • Terms of inclusion: The inclusion of these countries would require a complex process of negotiation of their compatibility with NATO’s principles, obligations, and defence commitments.

Significance of India joining NATO

  • Providing a security umbrella: Joining NATO will provide India with protection and deterrence against potential threats.
  • Strengthening India’s defence capabilities and modernisation efforts: India could also gain access to advanced military technologies, intelligence-sharing platforms, and interoperability with other member-states.

Potential impacts on India’s strategic autonomy Plus

  • On relations with other countries: Getting into any NATO framework will annoy Russia and China. Should it join, India’s solidified strategic partnership with Russia will crumble.
  • On India’s freedom of action: While aligning with NATO may be tempting due to the threats posed by China, having a military framework will limit India’s freedom of action and prevent it from pursuing an independent policy towards China.
  • On hopping into the Taiwan strategy of the U.S. under NATO Plus: It will complicate India’s security, with the possibility of Chinese justification for further military build-up along the India-China border.
  • On India’s defence and security policies: India will need to align its defence and security policies with the objectives and strategies of the alliance, thereby potentially undermining India’s autonomy.

Conclusion

  • While NATO has certain competencies to deal with such issues, its larger geopolitical agenda starting from Eurasia to the Indo-Pacific may divert resources and attention away from these pressing issues and, therefore, will not be of much help to India.
  • For the time being, India’s posturing through the Quad looks more promising than the NATO Plus bait, though China remains an elephant in the room during its summits.

Prelims Takeaway

  • NATO and NATO Plus
  • Quad
  • Other regional groupings

Categories