UNSC reforms: India needs to take charge
- The UN Security Council (UNSC), one of the main six organs of the United Nations, was established during the World War era.
- The organisation gives excessive powers to its five permanent members (P-5) which emerged as supreme powers of that era. However, the realities of that time are completely incomparable to the present.
- There is a longstanding acknowledgement of the need to expand the UNSC, both its permanent and non-permanent membership, to make it representative of the contemporary world, and not the world of its founding in 1945.
- However, the Council has shown nothing in terms of what is called progress. Serious questions are being raised about its ability to serve the purpose of its existence.
- In this context, India, now being in the second year of its two year tenure for UNSC non-permanent membership, can play a bigger and important role in bringing out UNSC reforms.
UN Security Council and India
- About UNSC: The UNSC, with a mandate to maintain international peace and security, is the centrepiece of global multilateralism.
- It selects the UN Secretary-General and plays a co-terminus role with the UN General Assembly in electing judges to the International Court of Justice.
- Its resolutions, adopted under chapter VII of the UN charter, are binding on all countries.
- The UNSC is composed of 15 members, 5 permanent and 10 non-permanent.
Five permanent members: China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
- Ten non-permanent members: Elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly.
- India’s Membership: India has served seven times in the UN Security Council as a non-permanent member and in January 2021, India entered the UNSC for the eighth time.
- India has been advocating a permanent seat in UNSC.
- India took active part in the formulation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1947-48 and raised its voice passionately against racial discrimination in South Africa.
- India has played its part in formulating decisions on several issues such as admitting former colonies to the UN, addressing deadly conflicts in the Middle East and maintaining peace in Africa.
- It has contributed extensively to the UN, particularly for the maintenance of international peace and security.
- India has taken part in 43 Peacekeeping missions with a total contribution exceeding 160,000 troops and a significant number of police personnel.
- As of August 2017, India is the third largest troop contributor, with 7,860 personnel deployed with 10 UN Peacekeeping Missions.
- India's population, territorial size, GDP, economic potential, civilisational legacy, cultural diversity, political system and past and ongoing contributions to UN activities make India’s demand for a permanent seat in the UNSC completely rational.
Issues Associated to Functioning of UNSC
- Absence of Records and Texts of Meetings: The current rate of progress in the UNSC raises serious questions about its ability to serve the purpose of its existence.
- The usual UN rules don’t apply to the UNSC deliberations and no records are kept of its meetings.
- Additionally, there is no “text” of the meeting to discuss, amend or object.
- The ‘text’ is a term used for a formal document containing proposals and options in diplomatic meetings.
- Powerplay in UNSC: The main problem with the current system is the capturing of governing capacity of international security relations by the elite class of countries.
- The veto powers that the UNSC’s five permanent members enjoy is an anachronism in this age.
- The elite decision-making structure does not suit the current global security needs.
- The UNSC in its current form has become a constraint in understanding the international changes and dynamics in the area of human security and peace.
- Divisions Among the P5: There is a deep polarisation within the UN’s membership, so decisions are either not taken, or not heeded.
- Frequent divisions within the UNSC P-5 end up blocking key decisions.
- These issues can be manifested in the example of the emergence of the coronavirus pandemic where the UN, the UNSC, and WHO failed to play an effective role in helping nations deal with the spread.
- An Underrepresentation Organisation: The UNSC has been unable to act with credibility essentially due to its unrepresentative nature.
- The absence in the UNSC of the globally important countries – India, Germany, Brazil and South Africa - is a matter of concern.
- The existing gaps in terms of the under-representation of regions especially from Africa, Asia and Latin America is crippling the UNSC as a global institution governing international peace and security.